• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: need help on understanding the crashreporter traces
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: need help on understanding the crashreporter traces


  • Subject: Re: need help on understanding the crashreporter traces
  • From: Arnab Ganguly <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:41:39 +0530

I was testing out, whether the stack trace generated by Talkback matches
with that of Apple crash report.It is always matching with Thread 0
irrespective of any other thread crashed.Not sure whether it is correct ?
-A

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Andrew Farmer <email@hidden> wrote:

> On 25 Feb 09, at 22:34, Arnab Ganguly wrote:
>
>> I am analysing the Apple crash report.So I launched my application and
>> tried
>> to forcibly (kill -11 pid) crash the application.The app crashed and even
>> the Apple crash report got generated.
>> The crash report says Thread 1 crashed, but when I go through the stack
>> trace of Thread 0 I see sigtramp is being received by Thread 0.Is this
>> correct report?
>>
>> How is the thread received signal is different from the thread that got
>> crashed as per the report ?Any help or suggestion would be of great help.
>>
>>
>> I have given below the crash report.The highlighted line shows that signal
>> was received by Thread 0 but the crash was happened on Thread 1.I was
>> crashing the application forcibly by sending signal 11 from the command
>> prompt multiple times.There I am confused or may be way I am interpreting
>> is
>> incorrect.
>>
> <snip>
>
> 1. _sigtramp ("signal trampoline") is an internal routine within libSystem,
> not a signal. It's showing up on the main thread because signal handlers are
> always run on the main thread (IIRC).
>
> 2. You're testing this with an application that implements its own crash
> handler (Talkback). You'll get much clearer results if you disable this or
> test with another application.
>
> You'll also get much clearer results if you generate an actual segmentation
> violation, rather than sending SIGSEGV. The two are not quite equivalent in
> Darwin.
>
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >need help on understanding the crashreporter traces (From: Arnab Ganguly <email@hidden>)
 >Re: need help on understanding the crashreporter traces (From: Andrew Farmer <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: noobie mem management problem
  • Next by Date: Draw to an NSOpenGLView or NSView without subclassing them?
  • Previous by thread: Re: need help on understanding the crashreporter traces
  • Next by thread: Radio Buttons not Selecting Properly
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread