• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Security With Show Package Contents?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Security With Show Package Contents?


  • Subject: Re: Security With Show Package Contents?
  • From: "Julien Jalon" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:39:13 +0100

New Pages format is the same but zipped.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Devon Ferns <email@hidden> wrote:

> Have you checked if the new Pages file format is now binary instead of a
> package?  That would be my guess.  I don't see how you can stop anyone from
> listing a directory structure.
>
> Devon
>
> Chunk 1978 wrote:
>
>> so i was a little put off after purchasing iWork '09, because i could
>> no longer access "Show Package Contents" of my pages files.  i
>> generally used this to swap out images of the same size, or to color
>> balance, etc.
>>
>> anyway, i started thinking about security of applications based on
>> showing package contents.  as far as i know the only way for someone
>> to crack an application is to have access to the package contents
>> which lists the Unix Executable File in the Mac OS folder.  i guess
>> there's also the possibility to swap out frameworks (particularly
>> Aquatic Prime framework if the framework is installed instead of the
>> Aquatic Prime library)... since apps are really just folders with a
>> .app extension, wouldn't it be possible to disable "Show Package
>> Contents", as with the new .pages files, so that it would make the app
>> more secure (if not impossible to crack)?  couldn't Apple implement
>> some sort of password protection or optional block on viewing package
>> contents with XCode so that apps are impossible to crack?
>>
>> this post is totally just me thinking out loud.  i personally believe
>> that if someone is going to download a cracked version of an app then
>> either they wouldn't have bought a license anyway, or they don't have
>> the money... i'm not trying to make an app of mine more secure.  but
>> i'd like to hear your thoughts about this.
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>>
>> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
>> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>>
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Security With Show Package Contents? (From: "Chunk 1978" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Security With Show Package Contents? (From: Devon Ferns <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Security With Show Package Contents?
  • Next by Date: Re: Mac Pro memory sizes
  • Previous by thread: Re: Security With Show Package Contents?
  • Next by thread: Re: Security With Show Package Contents?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread