Re: Binding of invisible controls: is lazy data loading possible?
Re: Binding of invisible controls: is lazy data loading possible?
- Subject: Re: Binding of invisible controls: is lazy data loading possible?
- From: mmalc Crawford <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:11:56 -0800
On Jan 21, 2009, at 12:30 AM, Quincey Morris wrote:
If anyone can find a place in any documentation or header files
that *says* the indexed to-many accessors (such as
insertObject:in<Key>AtIndex: and removeObjectFrom<Key>AtIndex:)
are KVO-compliant when used directly, you'd be doing a public
service by posting a link.
While researching an answer for a different thread, I found it:
Ah, thanks for finding it. :)
It's not clear why this is any more satisfactory than the previous...
I'm working up to submitting a documentation bug report, but the
whole subject is (TBH) kind of of messily documented, and I haven't
quite worked out yet what I want to complain about.
"'Ensuring KVO Compliance' at <http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/KeyValueObserving/Concepts/KVOCompliance.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/20002178
> should make explicit whether a class that allows automatic observer
notifications for a property will automatically emit KVO change
notifications for KVC-compliant collection mutators."
mmalc
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden