Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Clarification on accessors? (was: Yet another memory management question)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Clarification on accessors? (was: Yet another memory management question)

Subject: Re: Clarification on accessors? (was: Yet another memory management question)
From: Bill Bumgarner <email@hidden>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:23:42 -0700

On Jul 8, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Sean McBride wrote:
On 7/8/09 11:20 AM, Erik Buck said:

The bottom line is that accessors are the only way to set synthesized
instance variables to nil in the modern (64bit) Objective-C runtime.

True.  But if I remember previous discussions correctly, that's a bug,
not a feature.

Correct. 'Tis a bug. A fixed one, too, if you have access to the Snow Leopard seeds or grab the clang compiler from the llvm.org repository.

b.bum

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >Re: Clarification on accessors? (was: Yet another memory management	question) (From: Erik Buck <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Clarification on accessors? (was: Yet another memory management question) (From: "Sean McBride" <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: setting a CGContextRef to the current Context

Next by Date:
Re: Clarification on accessors? (was: Yet another memory management	question)

Previous by thread:
Re: Clarification on accessors? (was: Yet another memory management question)

Next by thread:
Re: Inquiry

Index(es):

Date
Thread