Re: Garbage collected and non-garbage collected
Re: Garbage collected and non-garbage collected
- Subject: Re: Garbage collected and non-garbage collected
- From: Robert Mullen <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:07:44 -0700
I also have the option of abandoning the framework and functionality
although that is not an appealing option. I am enjoying the process of
determining the course to rectify GC in this framework (in a perverse
sort of way) but I am not sure how long that will last. Every time I
run into a persistent problem it is an opportunity to learn Cocoa, X-
Code, and Objective-C a little better and that is fun in a challenging
way. I know from experience though that this can turn from an
enjoyably challenging diversion into a frustratingly endless cycle of
refactoring. Wish me luck...
On Mar 10, 2009, at 11:57 AM, I. Savant wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Robert Mullen <email@hidden>
wrote:
GC systems have become efficient enough in our modern world that I
think manual memory management > has become pretty specialized and
out of place in 80% of desktop applications.
I won't disagree there.
Anybody want to argue the other direction? I am always willing to
learn.
Sure: Projected time invested in GC'ifying the other
framework(s)? :-)
--
I.S.
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden