• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Strategy for acting on changes in child objects?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Strategy for acting on changes in child objects?


  • Subject: Re: Strategy for acting on changes in child objects?
  • From: Seth Willits <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:25:47 -0700

On May 7, 2009, at 1:39 AM, Caleb Strockbine wrote:

A. each observable object class exports a list of properties that it
thinks may be of interest to an observer. This is just an array of
strings (property names) returned by a class method.

B. A utility method iterates over that list and registers a nominated
observer against each one. There is also a complementary de-observing
method.

C. The observer calls the utility method on the child passing itself
as an observer.

Isn't that pretty much what +keyPathsForValuesAffectingValueForKey: is for? The parent object could observe a single property, such as 'modified', and any children would implement either +keyPathsForValuesAffectingValueForKey: or +keyPathsForValuesAffectingModified to return the set of the properties that would cause a child to be treated as modified. No utility method needed -- KVO does it for you.



Not exactly.

keyPathsForValuesAffectingValueForKey: is closer to my solution to override setValue:forKey[Path]: in the child object in order to trigger a change in an "isModified" key. There are two differences between mine and kPFVAVFK though:

1) mine is less code when observing all key changes (otherwise it's a bit more)

2) when overriding setValue:forKey: you have a place to set the BOOL mIsModified instance variable to YES, so that the - (BOOL)isModified method returns the right value. kPFVAVFK triggers a willChange/ didChange, but there's no hook for you to actually *make* the change (simply).


Graham's idea notifies the parent of any change in the child without having to use an "isModified" key, which is a bit cleaner. I think an even better solution would be to merge Mike Ash's dedicated KV observer object with the general idea of Graham's. I'm going to have to fiddle a bit.



-- Seth Willits



_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Strategy for acting on changes in child objects?
      • From: Seth Willits <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Strategy for acting on changes in child objects? (From: Caleb Strockbine <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: losing focus momentarily, over and over again
  • Next by Date: Re: Tri-state Check box
  • Previous by thread: Re: Strategy for acting on changes in child objects?
  • Next by thread: Re: Strategy for acting on changes in child objects?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread