Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Key-Value Observing: light-weight or heavy-weight?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Key-Value Observing: light-weight or heavy-weight?

Subject: Re: Key-Value Observing: light-weight or heavy-weight?
From: Jerry Krinock <email@hidden>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 10:11:37 -0700


On 2009 May 07, at 17:29, Stuart Malin wrote:

is each individual observer reasonably light-weight, and this a viable way to go.

Well, I wish you'd get an answer from someone smarter about this than me, but since you didn't, here's my two cents:

KVO is light-weight.

Also, since you're considering some "servious" KVO, besides Apple's documentation, read this:

http://mikeash.com/?page=pyblog/key-value-observing-done-right.html

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >Key-Value Observing: light-weight or heavy-weight? (From: Stuart Malin <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: Tri-state Check box

Next by Date:
Re: iPhone Telephone APIs

Previous by thread:
Key-Value Observing: light-weight or heavy-weight?

Next by thread:
NSTokenFieldCell in NSTableView

Index(es):

Date
Thread