• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: question about informal protocols
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: question about informal protocols


  • Subject: Re: question about informal protocols
  • From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:57:30 +0100

Le 20 nov. 2009 à 20:46, Michael de Haan a écrit :

> I am working through an example in  Buck/Yacktman's book that uses an informal protocol.
>
> In the interface of of a custom class,  it is declared as such.
>
>
> #import <Cocoa/Cocoa.h>
>
>
> @interface MyShapeEditorDocument : NSDocument
> {
>    ....ivars....
> }
> @end
>
>
> @interface NSObject(MYShapeEditingDocEditor)
>
>
>
> -(void) controllerDidEndEditing;
> @end
>
>
> In the implementation file it is defined, twice, thus.
>
>
> @implementation NSObject(MYShapeEditingDocEditor)
>
> -(void) controllerDidEndEditing
> {
>
> }
> @end
>
> and in the main body of the code, thus.
>
>
> @implementation MyShapeEditorDocument
>
>
> -(void) controllerDidEndEditing
> {
>    [[self myView] setNeedsDisplay: YES];
>    [[self table] reloadData];
> }
>
>
> Apple's docs say:  "When used to declare a protocol, a category interface doesn’t have a corresponding implementation. Instead, classes that implement the protocol declare the methods again in their own interface files and define them along with other methods in their implementation files."  (http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/Articles/ocProtocols.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP30001163-CH15-TPXREF147)
>
>
> What I am not following is the seemingly double definitions. From the docs, it would seem that implementation is a 2 step process, not a 3 step as above, even though this is clearly correct. What is the essence that I am missing?


The usual way is to NOT implements the NSObject category and test if the delegate implements the method using -respondsToSelector:
But this way works too if you don't want to have to test before sending your message.

Anyway, informal protocols are "deprecated" in favor of @protocol with @optional method.


-- Jean-Daniel




_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: question about informal protocols
      • From: Michael de Haan <email@hidden>
References: 
 >question about informal protocols (From: Michael de Haan <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: question about informal protocols
  • Next by Date: Re: IBOutlets or property + binding
  • Previous by thread: question about informal protocols
  • Next by thread: Re: question about informal protocols
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread