• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Programming Style: Method Definition with or without a semicolon.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Programming Style: Method Definition with or without a semicolon.


  • Subject: Re: Programming Style: Method Definition with or without a semicolon.
  • From: glenn andreas <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:19:41 -0500


On Oct 16, 2009, at 2:55 AM, Bill Bumgarner wrote:


On Oct 16, 2009, at 12:17 AM, Sander Stoks wrote:

If it's a feature, then it's definitely a new one since the original specification of Objective-C. It turned out to be surprisingly hard to find that specification, but I found a grammar description here:http://www.cilinder.be/docs/next/NeXTStep/3.3/nd/ Concepts/ObjectiveC/B_Grammar/Grammar.htmld/index.html

There it says:

instance-method-definition:
<sp.gif><c2D.gif> [ method-type ] method-selector [ declaration- list ] compound-statement


method-selector:
<sp.gif>unary-selector
<sp.gif>keyword-selector  [ ,  ... ]
<sp.gif>keyword-selector  [ ,  parameter-type-list ]

The declaration-list and compound-statement are not specified further and are taken from the C spec. In other words: There's no semicolon.

On the other hand, the grammar spec has been removed from Apple's documentation, and I suppose the official line is now "Objective-C is whatever we ship with Xcode."

I haven't booted my NS 0.8 cube in about a decade, but I'm pretty sure the semi-colon was always required in the header file and always allowed in the @implementation.


'Twas many a moon ago, but, I do distinctly remember triple-clicking method declarations from headers (with semis) to copy-paste into my implementation without deleting the semi. It always stuck with me as an über-convenience.

b.bum


You can (or at least could) copy the entire @interface section from the .h, paste into the .m and change @interface to @implementation and it would compile.

So yes, this is legal:

@implementation MyObject : NSObject<SomeProtocol> {
	id myIvar;
}
- (void) doSomething;
@end

Not that I'd recommend or even admit to doing this (I have no idea what happens if the @implementation class details are different from the @interface ones, and, again, not that I'd ever admit to having done this, it is easy to accidentally write your implementation in your .h file and leave the pasted @interface in your .m).


Glenn Andreas email@hidden
The most merciful thing in the world ... is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents - HPL


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Programming Style: Method Definition with or without a semicolon. (From: Sander Stoks <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Programming Style: Method Definition with or without a semicolon. (From: Bill Bumgarner <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Programming Style: Method Definition with or without a semicolon.
  • Next by Date: NSCollectionView issues
  • Previous by thread: Re: Programming Style: Method Definition with or without a semicolon.
  • Next by thread: Simultaneous Recording and Playback
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread