Re: Upgrading NSDocument format, best practice
Re: Upgrading NSDocument format, best practice
- Subject: Re: Upgrading NSDocument format, best practice
- From: "I. Savant" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 10:36:33 -0400
On Sep 16, 2009, at 10:28 AM, Markus Spoettl wrote:
Better, yes, though I haven't had many problems understanding the
first version either. You mustn't be too hard on yourself.
Hard on myself? Nah. I was laughing at myself. :-)
It was particularly funny when an angry person who shall go unnamed
took every a few opportunities to hit me off-list any time I'd slip
up. S/he had no idea whatsoever how much it only added to my
laughter. :-D
I didn't think of changing the file extension, that would definitely
work. Thanks for that! I'm loosing my precious file extension which
I'm so fond of, though.
I faced that once too. I got over it.
You might try simply expanding it. Say you named your "Retro
Frabulator Document" as ".rfd". Why not call it ".retrofab" or
".retrofabdoc"? Obviously you don't want the extension to be
ridiculously long but there are a LOT of custom doc formats out there
(tens of thousands? hundreds of thousands?) and we have a more modern
file system ... why limit ourselves?
--
I.S.
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden