• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Is this the correct way to cache an IMP?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is this the correct way to cache an IMP?

  • Subject: Re: Is this the correct way to cache an IMP?
  • From: Ken Thomases <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:53:29 -0500
On Aug 5, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:

> As I pointed in my previous post, just define the function inside your class body (between @implementation and @end), and you will be able to access private ivars using pointer syntax.

Yes.  A function within an @implementation is a part of the class and has full access.

Regards,
Ken

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Is this the correct way to cache an IMP? (From: Graham Cox <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Is this the correct way to cache an IMP? (From: Ken Thomases <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Is this the correct way to cache an IMP? (From: Graham Cox <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Is this the correct way to cache an IMP? (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Is this the correct way to cache an IMP?
  • Next by Date: Re: Is this the correct way to cache an IMP?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Is this the correct way to cache an IMP?
  • Next by thread: Re: Is this the correct way to cache an IMP?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread