Re: self = [super init], nil?
Re: self = [super init], nil?
- Subject: Re: self = [super init], nil?
- From: Joanna Carter <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 19:36:33 +0100
Hi Henry
> The forces of darkness won, and that's how Java now has rebarbative terminology such as 'non-static method' to
> mean 'instance method'. Observe carefully, Grasshopper: if you do not see the word ''static' before a method, then
> you know that it is a 'non-static method'. Yuck.
I think one of the reasons why C# avoids talking about "class" methods is because they don't have the concept of a class, as a class of its own, they use System.Type instead, using reflection and lightweight code generation to "emulate" virtual class methods.
I must admit, virtual constructors and class methods, available in Delphi, were something I missed in C#, and am glad to be back in more friendly territory.
Joanna
--
Joanna Carter
Carter Consulting
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden