Re: Calling getter on const object
Re: Calling getter on const object
- Subject: Re: Calling getter on const object
- From: David Duncan <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 08:53:46 -0800
My question is why do you need to have a 'const' pointer.
On Nov 8, 2010, at 8:37 AM, Jonny Taylor wrote:
> I'm afraid I'm not sure if I understand exactly what you're asking. I would like to be able access the "frame number" property (which is in fact stored as a variable within the class, and is fixed soon after instantiation) in spite of the fact that I only have a 'const' pointer to the object at the time I want to access it. Semantically I don't see why it should be unsafe to attempt to find out the value of that property.
--
David Duncan
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden