• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Foundation vs Core Foundation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Foundation vs Core Foundation


  • Subject: Foundation vs Core Foundation
  • From: Jon Sigman <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:59:14 -0800 (PST)

I'm new to OSX/Cocoa, coming from Solaris. I'm porting the functionality of a
Solaris connection server to Mac OS X. "Porting" isn't exactly the right word
since I'm taking the liberty to use Cocoa and whatever else OSX offers to get
things working well, including rearchitecting.

Before I start down the wrong path: What is the difference between a Foundation
tool and a Core Foundation tool? Primarily I will be needing to use TCP/IP
sockets, file I/O, and multithreading, so is one a better fit than the other? I
believe OSX calls this type of GUI-less background process a 'daemon'. This
would be for Snow Leopard.

Thanks,
-Jon




_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Foundation vs Core Foundation
      • From: Sherm Pendley <email@hidden>
    • Re: Foundation vs Core Foundation
      • From: Dave Keck <email@hidden>
    • Re: Foundation vs Core Foundation
      • From: James Bucanek <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: bindings via file's owner don't update
  • Next by Date: Re: Foundation vs Core Foundation
  • Previous by thread: iOS: UIWindow orientation
  • Next by thread: Re: Foundation vs Core Foundation
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread