Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Designated Initializer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Designated Initializer

Subject: Re: Designated Initializer
From: Richard Somers <email@hidden>
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 14:32:57 -0600

Thanks for the insight.

If calling any of super's initializers will work from the designated initializer, why then does Apple specifically say the designated initializer "should begin by sending a message to super to invoke the designated initializer of its superclass"?

There must be a subtle issue here.

--Richard Somers

On Oct 30, 2010, at 1:12 PM, Dave Carrigan wrote:

So just because a designated initializer didn't call super's designated initializer, it doesn't mean that super's designated initialer was not invoked; it was.


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: Designated Initializer
From: Julien Jalon <email@hidden>


References:  
  >Designated Initializer (From: Richard Somers <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Designated Initializer (From: Dave Carrigan <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: Designated Initializer

Next by Date:
Re: Designated Initializer

Previous by thread:
Re: Designated Initializer

Next by thread:
Re: Designated Initializer

Index(es):

Date
Thread