Re: [Q] including omp.h?
Re: [Q] including omp.h?
- Subject: Re: [Q] including omp.h?
- From: Jeffrey Walton <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 06:01:46 -0400
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Marcus Karlsson <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> --On August 6, 2011 5:25:53 AM -0400 Jeffrey Walton <email@hidden>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Marcus Karlsson <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> --On August 5, 2011 11:32:09 AM -0400 Sean McBride
>>> <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 16:49:34 -0700, JongAm Park said:
>>>>
>>>>> Because gcc now supports OpenMP, we can use pragmas for OpenMP without
>>>>> doing any special steps except for setting "Enable OpenMP" and
>>>>> "-fopenmp".
>>>>
>>>> I don't have an answer for you.... but are you aware that Apple is
>>>> ditching gcc for clang, and that the latter does not support OpenMP?
>>>
>>> Apple may ditch gcc but that doesn't mean that users have to.
>>
>> Do you really have a practical choice?
>>
>> [ SNIP]
>>
>> Jeff
>
> Yes you have. Why wouldn't you? A compiler is not different than any other
> software. It takes source code and produces executable code. That code may
> link to other executable code contained in libraries. As long as all
> libraries are available at run time the program will run. Other than things
> like varying degrees of optimization there's no difference between code
> produced by one C compiler and code produced by another.
While I don't really disagree with you, I get the impression you've
never compiled GCC and GDB for an Apple system. No corporate support
makes things difficult at best.
Jeff
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden