Re: Singletons with ARC
Re: Singletons with ARC
- Subject: Re: Singletons with ARC
- From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:36:35 +0100
Le 9 déc. 2011 à 08:47, Ken Thomases a écrit :
> On Dec 9, 2011, at 1:11 AM, Uli Kusterer wrote:
>
>> On 09.12.2011, at 07:55, Ken Thomases wrote:
>>>
>>> Double-checked locking is broken. It is an anti-pattern in many languages, including the C family under most common implementations. Don't use it. Google it if you want to confirm. One reference: <http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel/DoubleCheckedLocking.html>.
>>
>> Is this an issue that just exists when you want to write against ANSI C, or is this an actual, practical concern when writing on the Mac, for MacOS or iOS?
>
> It is an actual, practical concern. The compilers can re-order memory accesses. The CPU can, too.
>
> The second and subsequent threads through the double-checked lock can see the singleton pointer as non-nil, but the pointed-to object may not be valid. Its content may not have been written to memory, yet.
>
It was a real concern on PPC, but on Intel platform AFAIK.
Memory barriers are noop on x86, as it does not perform out of order execution of memory operations.
http://locklessinc.com/articles/singleton_pattern/
That said,avoiding this pattern in the future may be a good thing.
-- Jean-Daniel
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden