• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Reliable way to determine bitness of the kernel
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reliable way to determine bitness of the kernel


  • Subject: Re: Reliable way to determine bitness of the kernel
  • From: Wim Lewis <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:16:29 -0800

On 22 Feb 2011, at 10:09 AM, eveningnick eveningnick wrote:
> i have a kext (or, rather, 2 kexts - one built with -arch i386, another one
> with -arch x86_64). They should work on both OS X 10.5 and 10.6.
> i have an installing script, which looks like
> if [ `uname -a | grep x86_64 | wc -l` ge 1 ]; then
>   cp -R "64bit.kext" "/Library/Extensions/"
> else
>   cp -R "32bit.kext" "/Library/Extensions/"

I've never tried developing a kext, but is there a reason you can't lipo the two versions together to create a fat executable? Then the kernel will just automatically load the correct one.


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Reliable way to determine bitness of the kernel (From: eveningnick eveningnick <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Accessing a managedObject property from within an accessor of another property
  • Next by Date: Re: Reliable way to determine bitness of the kernel
  • Previous by thread: Reliable way to determine bitness of the kernel
  • Next by thread: Re: Reliable way to determine bitness of the kernel
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread