Re: Threading synchronization: does a primitive exists?
Re: Threading synchronization: does a primitive exists?
- Subject: Re: Threading synchronization: does a primitive exists?
- From: Graham Cox <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 09:01:09 +1000
On 05/05/2011, at 11:51 PM, eveningnick eveningnick wrote:
> What i need - is to stop the thread A immediately after the thread B
> has been spawned by a thread A.
Hang on. Why use a thread at all? If Thread A simply calls the process B synchronously, it will achieve exactly what you have stated you want - that A will stop when B starts, and will continue when B finishes.
--Graham
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden