Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: nonatomic vs atomic assign/retain

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: nonatomic vs atomic assign/retain

Subject: Re: nonatomic vs atomic assign/retain
From: Scott Ribe <email@hidden>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:00:56 -0600

On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote:

> Given that access to the outlets
> is only valid after a certain safe point (awakeFromNib) one could
> consider outlets final/immutable and therefor synchronization should
> not be required.

You can change outlets at any time after that. Consider changing the delegate for some reason, or swapping views in & out, and so on.

--
Scott Ribe
email@hidden
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

Follow-Ups:
- Re: nonatomic vs atomic assign/retain
  - From: Torsten Curdt <email@hidden>

References:
	>nonatomic vs atomic assign/retain (From: Torsten Curdt <email@hidden>)
	>Re: nonatomic vs atomic assign/retain (From: Thomas Davie <email@hidden>)
	>Re: nonatomic vs atomic assign/retain (From: Joar Wingfors <email@hidden>)
	>Re: nonatomic vs atomic assign/retain (From: Torsten Curdt <email@hidden>)

Prev by Date: Re: The best way to call Cocoa methods not implemented in previous versions of the SDK?
Next by Date: Re: nonatomic vs atomic assign/retain
Previous by thread: Re: nonatomic vs atomic assign/retain
Next by thread: Re: nonatomic vs atomic assign/retain
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread