• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Bookmark alias files v. Finder alias files
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bookmark alias files v. Finder alias files


  • Subject: Re: Bookmark alias files v. Finder alias files
  • From: Alex Zavatone <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:13:21 -0400

Along these lines, I made an alias to one of my project files that was 48K.

The alias is 668 K.

W T F?

What's the point of aliases if they are this fat?

On Apr 15, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Michael Hall wrote:

>
> On Apr 15, 2012, at 7:36 AM, Shane Stanley wrote:
>
>> On 15/04/2012, at 9:23 PM, Michael Hall wrote:
>>
>>> If your criteria is best variety of icons, then current could be argued buggy since it only has one icon resource to the Finder's two.
>>
>> But the Finder really only has one, twice.
>
>> the Finder has *two* such ‘icns’ resources; one with ID -16496 and one with ID -16455. The two ‘icns’ resources appear to be identical,
>
> Ah, I had remembered the two different id's but missed that the resources appear identical. If true possibly a bug.
> A little more checking...
>
> http://static.userland.com/Iowa/sourceListings/macbirdSource/Frontier SDK 4.1b1/Toolkits/Applet Toolkit/appletfilealias.c.html
>
> #define kCustomAliasIconID -16496
>
> Mention of -16545 here for example
> http://www.cocoabuilder.com/archive/cocoa/15858-setting-file-icon.html
>
> Again this seems to relate to custom icon id's so it is still possibly a duplicate bug. But you also still might have to do more digging to be sure having both id's doesn't have some special meaning to the Finder that is arguably non-buggy? Maybe some situation where having both id's means the Finder will correctly use the right icon where without the second one it wouldn't. Possibly an archaic situation so the newer code can omit it but the Finder has never been updated to change the archaic behavior? But it might take more verifying to be sure of which.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Bookmark alias files v. Finder alias files
      • From: Scott Ribe <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Bookmark alias files v. Finder alias files (From: Shane Stanley <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bookmark alias files v. Finder alias files (From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bookmark alias files v. Finder alias files (From: Shane Stanley <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bookmark alias files v. Finder alias files (From: Michael Hall <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bookmark alias files v. Finder alias files (From: Shane Stanley <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bookmark alias files v. Finder alias files (From: Michael Hall <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Bookmark alias files v. Finder alias files
  • Next by Date: Re: Bookmark alias files v. Finder alias files
  • Previous by thread: Re: Bookmark alias files v. Finder alias files
  • Next by thread: Re: Bookmark alias files v. Finder alias files
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread