• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: 32-bit on 10.8
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 32-bit on 10.8


  • Subject: Re: 32-bit on 10.8
  • From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:57:51 -0500

On Aug 10, 2012, at 7:44 PM, Jayson Adams <email@hidden> wrote:

> On Aug 10, 2012, at 5:17 PM, Charles Srstka wrote:
>
>>> You won't get one. But between you and me, I would say it is highly unlikely, since they'd kill MS Office support if they did that, and Office is one of the two or three most important third-party apps on OS X.
>>
>> MS is, however, working on rewriting Office in Cocoa (2011 already has some components rewritten; presumably, their next release will be more so). I wouldn't count on this situation continuing indefinitely.
>>
>> I'd get started on rewriting your app if I were you.
>
> Except Apple itself says it might not make sense to do so.  From the 64-bit Transition Guide:
>
> 	"Although 64-bit executables make it easier for you to manage large data sets (compared to memory mapping of large files in a 32-bit application), the use of 64-bit executables may raise other issues. Therefore you should transition your software to a 64-bit executable format only when the 64-bit environment offers a compelling advantage for your specific purposes.
>
> This chapter explores some of the reasons you might or might not want to transition your software to a 64-bit executable format…."
>
> https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Darwin/Conceptual/64bitPorting/indications/indications.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40001064-CH206-TPXREF101

That article is wildly out of date. Notice how it emphatically advises you *not* to compile your applications as 64-bit only, whereas 64-bit only is not only the default nowadays, but is required for all the latest additions Apple has made to the language (including, but not limited to, ARC). It also advises that you should include PPC code in your binaries, which Xcode doesn't even let you *do* anymore.

Charles
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: 32-bit on 10.8
      • From: Jayson Adams <email@hidden>
References: 
 >32-bit on 10.8 (From: koko <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: koko <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Kurt Bigler <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Nick Zitzmann <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 32-bit on 10.8 (From: Jayson Adams <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Detecting focus on control
  • Next by Date: Re: Detecting focus on control
  • Previous by thread: Re: 32-bit on 10.8
  • Next by thread: Re: 32-bit on 10.8
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread