Re: [Obj-C] if (self) vs. if (self != nil)
Re: [Obj-C] if (self) vs. if (self != nil)
- Subject: Re: [Obj-C] if (self) vs. if (self != nil)
- From: Scott Ribe <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:26:49 -0700
On Feb 25, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> And then show how that jives with footnote 56, which says that the intent of the standard is that null pointers become whatever integer is most similar to the bit pattern used for null pointers, which may or may not be the same as that used for integer zero depending on the platform.
Hmm. So Harbison & Steele (5th Edition) is wrong??? That's a surprise to me.
--
Scott Ribe
email@hidden
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden