Re: NSInteger vs int vs int32_t
Re: NSInteger vs int vs int32_t
- Subject: Re: NSInteger vs int vs int32_t
- From: Scott Ribe <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:00:49 -0600
On Jul 2, 2012, at 5:42 PM, David Duncan wrote:
> I suspect you are both talking past each other.
>
> Jens' assertion is that if you had a 128 byte cache, you could store either 8 64-bit integers or 16 32-bit integers in it. Whereas Kyle is asserting that the CPU need only read 32-bits at a time (or less) from the cache for opcodes that deal with 32-bits (or less) of data at a time.
I don't think so; I think Kyle was asserting that for a 32-bit integer on a 64-bit machine, the CPU would read 64 bits from the cache.
--
Scott Ribe
email@hidden
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden