• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Stupid block syntax!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Stupid block syntax!


  • Subject: Re: Stupid block syntax!
  • From: Dave <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 20:20:01 +0100


On 9 Jul 2012, at 13:33, Vincent Habchi wrote:

On 5 juil. 2012, at 02:45, Graham Cox <email@hidden> wrote:

I read recently that the '^' was the only possible operator that could be used due to the inherent grammar of C meaning that anything else would have introduced ambiguity

If I remember correctly, it has more to do with C++ overloading. ^ is not overloadable in C++, that was the unique such operator left.

Vincent

I just *knew* it *had* to be something to do with C++ Voodoo! I've never gotten on with it and now it's managed to infect me!

Dave

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Stupid block syntax! (From: Graham Cox <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Stupid block syntax! (From: Quincey Morris <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Stupid block syntax! (From: Dave <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Stupid block syntax! (From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Stupid block syntax! (From: Graham Cox <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Stupid block syntax! (From: Vincent Habchi <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: cocoabuilder closed?
  • Next by Date: Re: turning app into background app
  • Previous by thread: Re: Stupid block syntax!
  • Next by thread: Re: Stupid block syntax!
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread