Re: KVG generic enough?
Re: KVG generic enough?
- Subject: Re: KVG generic enough?
- From: Alex Zavatone <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:33:12 -0400
On Jul 18, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Graham Cox wrote:
>
> On 19/07/2012, at 12:57 AM, Alex Zavatone wrote:
>
>> How do you automatically know its type if you know its name? I'm interested to understand the "why" of that statement.
>
>
> Because it tells you the type right there in the @property declaration!
>
Ah, yes, when coding, of course. For some reason, I was expecting that during runtime/debugging, if you know the name of an object or you are accessing a object your coworker wrote there was some concept that instantly told you its class and makeup.
> If you're expecting a string and the object returns an array, who's at fault? Not you.
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden