• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Why do we use -fobjc-arc instead of removing code with #define?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why do we use -fobjc-arc instead of removing code with #define?


  • Subject: Re: Why do we use -fobjc-arc instead of removing code with #define?
  • From: Uli Kusterer <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 09:49:25 +0200

On 24.06.2012, at 03:41, Dave DeLong wrote:
> #define DD_RETAIN(_o) (_o)
> #define DD_RELEASE(_o)
> #define DD_AUTORELEASE(_o) (_o)


 IIRC GNUstep already has standard-defined RETAIN() macros etc. (When they added their garbage collector, way before Apple made their attempt at one) Might be worth just keeping the same terminology.

Cheers,
-- Uli Kusterer
"Die Zeugen des TeachText sind überall..."
http://www.wiederholungstaeter-podcast.de




_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Why do we use -fobjc-arc instead of removing code with #define? (From: Jerry Krinock <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Why do we use -fobjc-arc instead of removing code with #define? (From: Dave DeLong <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Trap mouse and keyboard events
  • Next by Date: Re: Why do we use -fobjc-arc instead of removing code with #define?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Why do we use -fobjc-arc instead of removing code with #define?
  • Next by thread: Document-scoped security conundrum (and bug)...
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread