Re: There's obviously something I don't understand about autorelease.
Re: There's obviously something I don't understand about autorelease.
- Subject: Re: There's obviously something I don't understand about autorelease.
- From: Quincey Morris <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 19:35:32 -0700
On Mar 17, 2012, at 18:59 , Roland King wrote:
> I will just need to be more diligent checking ivars against the properties they support to ensure they match
Clang *was* checking this, at least in Xcode 4.2.
We had a thread a couple of months ago discussing this, in a case where the check was over-zealous. Clang would produce a warning for '@synthesize foo' if the property was declared '@property (readonly)', and required you to declare it as '@property (readonly, strong)' to avoid the warning.
I mention this because Xcode 4.3's clang doesn't complain about this any more.
Also, note that 'weak' and 'strong' etc really shouldn't be on @property either, since they only affect the way the ivar is handled. The property itself is neither weak nor strong.
The justification given for leaving them on @property was that the complication of attributes on @synthesize seemed undesirable, and that @synthesize is headed the way of the dodo anyway.
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden