Re: Arghh bindings
Re: Arghh bindings
- Subject: Re: Arghh bindings
- From: Charles Srstka <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:28:14 -0500
On Sep 10, 2012, at 9:23 PM, Quincey Morris <email@hidden> wrote:
> It doesn't need "all the extra scaffolding". KVC will peer quite happily into your instance variables by default. What you don't get for free, in that case, is KVO compliance for the property. The purpose of providing explicit accessors is therefore twofold:
>
> 1. It avoids letting KVC introspect your ivars, which is a horrible hack.
>
> 2. It gives you automatic KVO compliance.
With that said, writing these accessors *is* rather mechanical and repetitive, and it would be nice if @synthesize could create the appropriate accessors in this case.
Charles
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden