Re: Arghh bindings
Re: Arghh bindings
- Subject: Re: Arghh bindings
- From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:30:50 -0700
On Sep 10, 2012, at 19:27 , Charles Srstka <email@hidden> wrote:
> On Sep 10, 2012, at 9:23 PM, Quincey Morris <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> It doesn't need "all the extra scaffolding". KVC will peer quite happily into your instance variables by default. What you don't get for free, in that case, is KVO compliance for the property. The purpose of providing explicit accessors is therefore twofold:
>>
>> 1. It avoids letting KVC introspect your ivars, which is a horrible hack.
>>
>> 2. It gives you automatic KVO compliance.
>
> With that said, writing these accessors *is* rather mechanical and repetitive, and it would be nice if @synthesize could create the appropriate accessors in this case.
I think the reason I keep screwing this up is because intuitively, it should just work (perhaps with lower performance, and only for the "obvious" pattern).
--
Rick
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden