• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Sandboxing not so bad
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Sandboxing not so bad


  • Subject: Re: Sandboxing not so bad
  • From: Kyle Sluder <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:14:40 -0700

Gentlemen,

I'm not a moderator, but I'm _sick_ of this argument. Can we please not
have it again?

--Kyle Sluder

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012, at 03:53 PM, Graham Cox wrote:
>
> On 14/09/2012, at 5:45 AM, James Merkel <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> > So unless I'm missing something, sandboxing is a piece of cake.
>
>
> Congratulations, your app uses the file system in a simple way, and in
> the way that was largely anticipated by the sandboxing design.
>
> It's when you have slightly unusual requirements that things get tricky.
> If you want to retain access to a file you opened across relaunches of
> your app, sandboxing will prevent that without special steps being taken.
> If you want to use the Save dialog to save a file WITHIN your sandbox,
> you can't. If you need access to files whose paths or URLs you create
> programmatically (e.g. you select a file.foo but it has a counterpart
> file.bar that you also need to access) you can't...
>
> These are the sorts of issues that have caused so much grief, not the
> simple ones you mention.
>
> --Graham
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Sandboxing not so bad
      • From: Graham Cox <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Sandboxing not so bad (From: James Merkel <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Sandboxing not so bad (From: Graham Cox <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Sandboxing not so bad
  • Next by Date: Another sandboxing snafu
  • Previous by thread: Re: Sandboxing not so bad
  • Next by thread: Re: Sandboxing not so bad
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread