Re: Sandboxing not so bad
Re: Sandboxing not so bad
- Subject: Re: Sandboxing not so bad
- From: Kyle Sluder <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:14:40 -0700
Gentlemen,
I'm not a moderator, but I'm _sick_ of this argument. Can we please not
have it again?
--Kyle Sluder
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012, at 03:53 PM, Graham Cox wrote:
>
> On 14/09/2012, at 5:45 AM, James Merkel <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> > So unless I'm missing something, sandboxing is a piece of cake.
>
>
> Congratulations, your app uses the file system in a simple way, and in
> the way that was largely anticipated by the sandboxing design.
>
> It's when you have slightly unusual requirements that things get tricky.
> If you want to retain access to a file you opened across relaunches of
> your app, sandboxing will prevent that without special steps being taken.
> If you want to use the Save dialog to save a file WITHIN your sandbox,
> you can't. If you need access to files whose paths or URLs you create
> programmatically (e.g. you select a file.foo but it has a counterpart
> file.bar that you also need to access) you can't...
>
> These are the sorts of issues that have caused so much grief, not the
> simple ones you mention.
>
> --Graham
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden