Re: Dumb ARC question
Re: Dumb ARC question
- Subject: Re: Dumb ARC question
- From: John McCall <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 22:02:11 -0800
On Dec 28, 2012, at 12:59 AM, Quincey Morris <email@hidden> wrote:
> On Dec 27, 2012, at 22:37, Rick Mann <email@hidden> wrote:
>> So, the usual bit about references being weak by default in C structs (and C++ classes) doesn't hold here.
>
> Huh? References aren't weak by default anywhere.
>
> Are you thinking of __usafe_unretained? That's not weak, just unmanaged by ARC, and it's the only ownership qualifier allowed by ARC for struct members that point to objects (and therefore highly unrecommended).
Just a quick clarification: this is not true in ARC-with-C++. Structs compiled in Objective-C++ mode are permitted to have __strong and __weak members.
John.
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden