Re: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse
Re: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse
- Subject: Re: Why is it wrong to have relationships without an inverse
- From: Rick Mann <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 19:31:15 -0700
On Jun 23, 2013, at 09:11 , Gordon Apple <email@hidden> wrote:
> On the original question asked in this thread, I have several similar
> places where I use a root object to also persist an object selection in the
> referenced collection. I could not see burdening the collection objects
> with another inverse relationship, so I just let these dangle, and ignore
> the compiler¹s complaints, because this is something that can usually be
> recovered from if there is a problem.
This is what I ended up doing. I wish there was a way to say, "Yes, I acknowledge this situation, no need to warn me about this one."
--
Rick
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden