• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: ARC vs Manual Reference Counting
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ARC vs Manual Reference Counting


  • Subject: Re: ARC vs Manual Reference Counting
  • From: Alex Zavatone <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 06:11:40 -0400

On Sep 9, 2013, at 1:43 AM, Patrick Cusack wrote:

> Apologies. I have no desire to start an internecine war. I have been reading up on ARC for the past few hours. I also watched the WWDC video on ARC, and after having watched and read everything, I kept feeling as if I was rather comfortable with the old manual memory model.
>
> I guess my real question is "Why did Apple decide to introduce ARC at all?". I am not convinced that the conventions are any easier than the previous model of manual retain counts.
>

In a large part, it's one less thing to worry about.  One less thing to have to keep in your head.

>
> Patrick



_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >ARC vs Manual Reference Counting (From: email@hidden)
 >Re: ARC vs Manual Reference Counting (From: Patrick Cusack <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: ARC vs Manual Reference Counting
  • Next by Date: Re: ARC vs Manual Reference Counting
  • Previous by thread: Re: ARC vs Manual Reference Counting
  • Next by thread: Re: ARC vs Manual Reference Counting
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread