Re: Core Data: Primitive Accessors & Ivar-Backed Properties
Re: Core Data: Primitive Accessors & Ivar-Backed Properties
- Subject: Re: Core Data: Primitive Accessors & Ivar-Backed Properties
- From: Sean McBride <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:58:41 -0400
- Organization: Rogue Research Inc.
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:52:05 -0600, Keary Suska said:
>I appreciate the feedback--I am more looking for general feedback by
>fellow developers about either canonical forms or useful conventions in
>situations where using an ivar-backed attribute is determined to be
>useful, rather than to address a specific problem.
An ivar-backed attribute in an NSManagedObject subclass? As opposed to an attribute in the xcdatamodel itself? If so, I have found little use for them, and generally prefer to use transient attributes, since they participate in the "free" undo support. On occasion, I'll use an ivar to get out of undo support actually.
Cheers,
--
____________________________________________________________
Sean McBride, B. Eng email@hidden
Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com
Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden