Re: ARC Retain Cycles
Re: ARC Retain Cycles
- Subject: Re: ARC Retain Cycles
- From: Greg Parker <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 16:42:30 -0700
Thanks for the bug report. If you could see rdar://10109782, you'd see that your report prompted a new discussion about the priority and schedule for this bug.
On Apr 24, 2014, at 4:09 PM, Roland King <email@hidden> wrote:
> "Engineering has determined that your bug report (16683382) is a duplicate of another issue (10109782) and will be closed."
>
> .. that wasn't very worthwhile was it.
>
> On 22 Apr, 2014, at 12:49 pm, Roland King <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> There you go. 16683382
>>
>> On 22 Apr, 2014, at 2:55 am, Greg Parker <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 20, 2014, at 3:40 PM, Roland King <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>> If however one of A or B happens to be KVO'ing the other, which happens a lot in my code, I use KVO everywhere, Leaks doesn't find the cycle. That's wrong, KVO doesn't make a strong reference, as you can tell from the 'freed when KVO was still attached to it' message, however it trips up Leaks. My handwaving belief is that KVO information is kept in a separate table somewhere and the Leaks process sees the A or B pointer in that memory and conservatively assumes the objects are referenced. I should probably file a but one day.
>>>
>>> Please file a bug report. Disguising pointers in side tables so leaks doesn't see them is routine.
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden