Re: Legal Opinion on GCUndoManager
Re: Legal Opinion on GCUndoManager
- Subject: Re: Legal Opinion on GCUndoManager
- From: Graham Cox <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2014 11:02:09 +1100
On 1 Feb 2014, at 4:32 am, Fritz Anderson <email@hidden> wrote:
> If I were implementing the review process, my automated checker would run strings(1) on the binary, and flag the collision with private API. Under my notional process, the reviewer would have to reject, because he has no way of knowing how the selector is used; or, even if your use is innocent, whether it propagates down into the framework so the collision with private API happens anyway.
> but if I’m right, the app would not simply sail through to acceptance.
Except that it does (so far, over several years), so the process must be different from your notional one.
To be on the safe side, I would prefer a cleaner way to handle this, but so far Quincey's suggestions haven't borne fruit, though I don't properly understand why. The problem seems clear enough: how to benignly swallow a method invocation to a private method without actually defining the method on the receiver.
--Graham
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden