Re: NSCoding vs NSSecureCoding
Re: NSCoding vs NSSecureCoding
- Subject: Re: NSCoding vs NSSecureCoding
- From: Michael Starke <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 10:45:39 +0200
On 17 Jun 2014, at 01:33, Sean McBride <email@hidden> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was modernizing some of my code to support NSSecureCoding instead of just NSCoding and stumbled upon that fact that NSColor and NSImage support only NSCoding and not NSSecureCoding. Whereas NSURL, NSData, NSArray and countless others now support NSSecureCoding.
>
> Is it just that Apple hasn't gotten around to NSColor and NSImage, or is there some rationale I'm not seeing?
For NSImage at least you can got the extra round via NSData. For NSColor I suspect you have to write something of your own.
Maybe that's the though behind it - NSData adopts NSSecureCoding, NSImage has an interface to get and set it via NSData. Who knows.
> Cheers,
>
> --
> ____________________________________________________________
> Sean McBride, B. Eng email@hidden
> Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com
> Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
___m i c h a e l s t a r k e____
geschäftsführer
HicknHack Software GmbH
www.hicknhack-software.com
___k o n t a k t____
+49 (170) 3686136
email@hidden
___H i c k n H a c k S o f t w a r e G m b H____
geschäftsführer - maik lathan | andreas reischuck | michael starke
bayreuther straße 32
01187 dresden
amtsgericht dresden HRB 30351
sitz - dresden
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden