• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Dictionaries or custom class containing no methods?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dictionaries or custom class containing no methods?


  • Subject: Re: Dictionaries or custom class containing no methods?
  • From: Lee Ann Rucker <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:35:10 -0700

Doesn't seem weird to me, I do it all the time. One advantage of using a custom class over a dictionary is that the compiler knows what's expected of it, while a dictionary is just a black box.


On Jun 17, 2014, at 3:21 PM, Trygve Inda wrote:

> I need to store a large collection of settings (not application preferences,
> but parameters describing how complex data is to be displayed) and am
> looking for pros/cons as to the best way.
>
> At the top I have a class called MySettings. Within this I need to have
> groups of related settings. They can either be NSMutableDictionary or a
> custom class containing properties, but no methods.
>
> @interface MySettings : NSObject
> {
>    MySettingsAppearance*    appearance;  // size, graphic style etc.
>    MySettingsColors*        colors;      // colors for different elements
>    MySettingsLocations*     locations;   // array of data
>
>    ... About 8 more like these ...
> }
>
>
> In this way I could do something like:
>
> [[settings appearance] width]
> [[settings colors] centerline]
> [[[settings locations] allLocations] objectAtIndex:i]
>
> Alternatively I could do:
>
> @interface MySettings : NSObject
> {
>    NSMutableDictionary*    appearance;  // size, graphic style etc.
>    NSMutableDictionary*    colors;      // colors for different elements
>    NSMutableDictionary*    locations;   // array of data
>
>    ... About 8 more like these ...
> }
>
>
> [[settings appearance] objectForKey:kSettingsAppearanceWidth]
> [[settings colors] objectForKey:kSettingsColorCenterline]
> [[[settings locations] objectForKey:kSettingsLocationsAll] objectAtIndex:i]
>
>
> All the data in the dictionaries (or custom property-only classes) will be
> standard types: NSNumber, NSData, NSString, NSColor (which will have to be
> archived to convert it to NSData for saving).
>
> Thoughts on the pros and cons of both methods?
>
> It feels weird to create a class that has zero methods (other than
> getters/setters).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Trygve
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Dictionaries or custom class containing no methods?
      • From: Trygve Inda <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Dictionaries or custom class containing no methods? (From: Trygve Inda <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Dictionaries or custom class containing no methods?
  • Next by Date: Re: Dictionaries or custom class containing no methods?
  • Previous by thread: Dictionaries or custom class containing no methods?
  • Next by thread: Re: Dictionaries or custom class containing no methods?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread