• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: provisioning profile is ignored
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: provisioning profile is ignored


  • Subject: Re: provisioning profile is ignored
  • From: Mike Kluev <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 20:07:13 +0000

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:10 PM, James Moore <email@hidden> wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2014, at 5:30 PM, Mike Kluev <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> i am signing my mac app with developers provisioning profile that
>> contains few uuids. then i am trying to run this app on the mac which
>> uuids is not included in the provisioning profile. i expect the app
>> fail to run, but it runs fine. am i missing something?
>
> Are you using any entitlements - like iCloud - that require that your Mac be provisioned? I don't think gatekeeper will prevent the app from launching if it's not requesting to use any machine-specific resources. As always Console is a good place to check.

i am specifying few entitlement keys including "sandbox", "network
client" and "usb".
that part seems to work ok, e.g. if i remove the network key and try
to access network
i'd get an error and an appropriate error string in console about it.

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >provisioning profile is ignored (From: Mike Kluev <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: menuNeedsUpdate for key equivalents?
  • Next by Date: VC# vs. ObjC and partial abstract classes
  • Previous by thread: provisioning profile is ignored
  • Next by thread: Re: EULA presentation requirements?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread