• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: VC# vs. ObjC and partial abstract classes
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VC# vs. ObjC and partial abstract classes

  • Subject: Re: VC# vs. ObjC and partial abstract classes
  • From: Chris Hanson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 20:07:24 -0700
On Mar 18, 2014, at 7:29 PM, Luther Baker <email@hidden> wrote:

> A _better_ analogy to an Objective-C @protocol would be a formal Java
> interface.

In their design, Java’s interfaces were explicitly modeled on Objective-C’s @protocol construct.

  -- Chris


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >VC# vs. ObjC and partial abstract classes (From: William Squires <email@hidden>)
 >Re: VC# vs. ObjC and partial abstract classes (From: Kyle Sluder <email@hidden>)
 >Re: VC# vs. ObjC and partial abstract classes (From: Luther Baker <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: VC# vs. ObjC and partial abstract classes
  • Next by Date: Re: VC# vs. ObjC and partial abstract classes
  • Previous by thread: Re: VC# vs. ObjC and partial abstract classes
  • Next by thread: Re: VC# vs. ObjC and partial abstract classes
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread