Re: Document architecture: locking document files while open
Re: Document architecture: locking document files while open
- Subject: Re: Document architecture: locking document files while open
- From: "Gary L. Wade" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 09:44:19 -0700
I've only just run across this as a potential solution to a prospective need, but might Kernel Authorizations be what you need?
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/technotes/tn2127/_index.html
--
Gary L. Wade (Sent from my iPhone)
http://www.garywade.com/
> On May 22, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Jens Alfke <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>> On May 22, 2014, at 8:51 AM, Matthew LeRoy <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone have any idea if there is a way to get the document architecture to lock a document file when it is opened?
>
> If you implement the lower-level read/write methods in NSDocument, you have full control over opening and closing the file. You can then make whatever filesystem calls you want to lock/unlock it.
>
>> When I say “lock”, I’m talking about an exclusive file lock at the filesystem level, as in no other user or process can open, move, or delete the file.
>
> There’s no such thing in standard Unix. The closest thing is “advisory” locks (i.e. flock(2)), which are opt-in and can be ignored, and only prevent modifying the file, not opening/moving/deleting it.
>
> HFS+ does have extended attributes that, I _think_ include some sort of “immutable” option, but from what you say below I don’t think that’s relevant here.
>
>> This causes all kinds of kooky and undesired behavior if a document on a remote filesystem is first opened in the Mac version (which does not lock the file), then opened concurrently by the Windows version (which locks the file).
>
> OK, here it gets even messier, because you’re talking about locking files on a file server. This involves the semantics of the file sharing protocol (you didn’t specify what it is), of OS X’s client implementation of that protocol, and of the underlying filesystem of the disk volume being shared. There are significant differences between the behavior of NFS, AFP and SMB, and between different versions of those, and different versions of OS X connecting to them … it’s quite a rat-hole. I’ve seen people give vehement advice to _never_ use SQLite databases on shared volumes, for example, because problems with file locking can easily cause database corruption.
>
> At a minimum you’re going to need to describe exactly what software is involved on both sides, and what file server protocol is in use.
>
> —Jens
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden