• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: App store rejection, inappropriate sandboxing
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: App store rejection, inappropriate sandboxing


  • Subject: Re: App store rejection, inappropriate sandboxing
  • From: Martin Hewitson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 09:00:19 +0100

Iain,

I forgot to say that this was the first thing I checked when the apps were first rejected. I moved from the automatic provisioning profile to explicit ones, but still the apps were rejected. Maybe I still got the provisioning profiles wrong. I’ll double check.

Thanks!

Martin



> On 29 Oct 2014, at 08:35, iain <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> I had the same issue: it turned out that Xcode's automatic provisioning profile choice was not as smart as I'd hoped and had picked a provisioning profile that had a maps entitlement. Setting the correct profile fixed it.
>
> I'd check there first before a DTS
>
> Iain
>
>
>
>> On 29 Oct 2014, at 7:01 am, Martin Hewitson <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Dear list,
>>
>> I recently submitted updates to three different apps on the app store. All three were rejected due to:
>>
>> "This app uses one or more entitlements which do not have matching functionality within the app. Apps should have only the minimum set of entitlements necessary for the app to function properly. Please remove all entitlements that are not needed by your app and submit an updated binary for review, including the following:
>>
>> com.apple.developer.maps
>> “
>>
>> None of these apps uses the maps entitlement. I’ve checked in Xcode that the entitlements file doesn’t contain this, and that under Capabilities the Maps switch is off. The resolution centre is suggesting that I use a DTS ticket to resolve this, but before I do, has anyone else had the same problem and found a solution?
>>
>> All submissions were made using Xcode Version 6.1 (6A1046a).
>>
>> Many thanks,
>>
>> Martin


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >App store rejection, inappropriate sandboxing (From: Martin Hewitson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: App store rejection, inappropriate sandboxing (From: iain <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: App store rejection, inappropriate sandboxing
  • Next by Date: Flash without photo?
  • Previous by thread: Re: App store rejection, inappropriate sandboxing
  • Next by thread: Flash without photo?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread