Re: copyWithZone archive/unarchive
Re: copyWithZone archive/unarchive
- Subject: Re: copyWithZone archive/unarchive
- From: Kyle Sluder <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:56:11 -0800
On Jan 30, 2015, at 7:26 AM, Trygve Inda <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 29, 2015, at 9:44 PM, Trygve Inda <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> However, naming conventions expect copy to not
>>> be autoreleased so should the above really be:
>>>
>>> return ([copy retain]);
>>
>> Yes, if you're really still not using ARC ;-)
>>
>> —Jens
>
> I am not using ARC - this is a large project that has existed for a long
> time and I see no reason to change it.
Just wanted to point out that you can adopt ARC on a per-file basis. Switching back and forth between them can be a bit of a mind bender, but that may be preferable to devoting a chunk of time to a wholesale conversion.
--Kyle Sluder
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden