Re: Bindings in view-based tables
Re: Bindings in view-based tables
- Subject: Re: Bindings in view-based tables
- From: Graham Cox <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 16:40:58 +1100
> On 6 Mar 2015, at 4:25 pm, Ken Thomases <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> So you're saying it's a bug?
>
> I think the bug is that IB hides the existence of the sub-NIB. If IB presented the sub-NIB with all of the usual placeholders and put a Shared User Defaults Controller into it when you set a binding on it, etc., that would help make this clear.
>
> Also, it's a bug that IB will blithely let you create connections from objects in the sub-NIB to objects outside the sub-NIB when those connections won't survive to runtime.
I got well and truly confused by all this first time I did anything with view-based tables.
The way IB has been "adapted" to handle this architecture is one collosal kludge. I wonder if any of us would be happy to release code that bad?
--Graham
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden