Re: Official or correct explanation of numbers on the 1st column for every method/function call in process sample?
Re: Official or correct explanation of numbers on the 1st column for every method/function call in process sample?
- Subject: Re: Official or correct explanation of numbers on the 1st column for every method/function call in process sample?
- From: JongAm Park <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:05:12 -0700
Well, it’s not the one I’m asking for.
+ 1379 start (in Wirecast) + 52 [0x100a31074]
^ ^
| |---- This is not the number I asked for.
|
|---- This is the number I asked for
Thanks,
> On Mar 17, 2015, at 2:58 PM, Steve Mills <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On Mar 17, 2015, at 15:52, JongAm Park <email@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Call graph:
>> 1379 Thread_839846: Main Thread DispatchQueue_<multiple>
>> + 1379 start (in Wirecast) + 52 [0x100a31074]
>> + 1379 main (in Wirecast) + 1070 [0x100b3e16a]
>> + 1379 eApp::Run(bool, zRecord*) (in libeva.dylib) + 779 [0x101033225]
>> + 1379 eWindowManager_cocoa::MessageLoop() (in libeva.dylib) + 70 [0x101037932]
>> + 1379 -[NSApplication run] (in AppKit) + 594 [0x7fff88cd2593]
>>
>> I can guess the number on the 1st (2nd?) on every row after + sign. It should be number of samples or how long a method/function take.
>
> The number after the + is the distance after the function named before the +. That's all I know. :)
>
> Steve via iPad
>
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden