Re: Properties: A question of style
Re: Properties: A question of style
- Subject: Re: Properties: A question of style
- From: Michael Starke <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 07:21:14 +0200
> On 15.06.2016, at 01:48, Graham Cox <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick point for discussion.
>
> Suppose I have a read-only BOOL property. What’s better, to declare it as:
>
> @property (readonly) BOOL isFoo;
>
> or:
>
> @property (readonly, getter=isFoo) BOOL foo;
>
>
> Is there any advantage to one over the other? n.b. I’d always use the latter form for read/write properties, it’s readonly ones that I’m wondering about.
>
> —Graham
>
Since I just ran into this the other day. If you tend to use NSStringFromSelector for creating binding keys the use of a custom setter or getter is a bit inconvenient as you need to supply the name compatible with setValueForKey/getValeForKey otherwise the binding system will fail because of an unknown selector being used either for the setter or the getter or if both are custom both. Or I just "held it wrong"
___m i c h a e l s t a r k e____
geschäftsführer
HicknHack Software GmbH
www.hicknhack-software.com
___k o n t a k t____
+49 (170) 36 86 1 36
email@hidden
___H i c k n H a c k S o f t w a r e G m b H____
geschäftsführer - maik lathan | andreas reischuck | michael starke
bayreuther straße 32
01187 dresden
amtsgericht dresden HRB 30351
sitz - dresden
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden