• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Success with NSTableView weak delegates?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Success with NSTableView weak delegates?


  • Subject: Re: Success with NSTableView weak delegates?
  • From: Greg Parker <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:41:07 -0700

> On Sep 20, 2016, at 2:47 PM, Sean McBride <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:26:27 -0700, David Duncan said:
>
>>> On Sep 20, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Sean McBride <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> WWDC 2016 Session 203 "What's New in Cocoa" at around 43:37 in the
>>> video, says that if you link against the 10.11 SDK that NSTableView's
>>> delegate is weak.  So I went and wrapped my delegate nil-ing in:
>>>
>>> #if MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED < 101100
>>> 	[tableView setDelegate:nil];
>>> 	[tableView setDataSource:nil];
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> yet (with NSZombie especially), I easily reproduce message-to-zombie
>>> crashes with builds that are made against the Xcode 7.3.1 10.11 SDK.
>>
>> On which OS version?
>
> At runtime: 10.9.5, 10.10.5, and 10.11.6.
>
>> The macro above only says “do this if I link against an SDK prior to
>> 10.11” – that doesn’t handle what happens at runtime when you are on
>> 10.10 or below. In particular, if you plan to deploy back to prior to
>> 10.11, then you would want to either do a runtime check, or for trivial
>> code like this always run the code until your MIN_ALLOWED (deployment
>> target) is >= 10.11.
>
> Yes, I'm aware of these differences.  I'm also aware, as you surely are, that sometimes behaviour depends (only) on what SDK you link against.
>
> If you scrub to around 43:37 here:
> <https://developer.apple.com/videos/play/wwdc2016/203/>
>
> you'll see they specifically refer to "linked on 10.11".
>
> Besides, I both build and run on 10.11.6 and yet I see these message-to-zombie crashes after removing the setDelegate:nil code.

Those crashes are expected.

NSTableView's delegate is zeroing-weak when both of the following are true:
* Your app was built with the 10.11 SDK or newer.
* Your app is running on 10.12 or newer.

The delegate is unsafe-unretained when running on 10.11 and earlier, no matter what SDK you built with.


--
Greg Parker     email@hidden <mailto:email@hidden>     Runtime Wrangler


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Success with NSTableView weak delegates?
      • From: Sean McBride <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Success with NSTableView weak delegates? (From: Sean McBride <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Success with NSTableView weak delegates? (From: David Duncan <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Success with NSTableView weak delegates? (From: Sean McBride <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Success with NSTableView weak delegates?
  • Next by Date: Re: Success with NSTableView weak delegates?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Success with NSTableView weak delegates?
  • Next by thread: Re: Success with NSTableView weak delegates?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread