Re: Stupid objective-c question
Re: Stupid objective-c question
- Subject: Re: Stupid objective-c question
- From: Quincey Morris <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:35:05 -0700
- Feedback-id: 167118m:167118agrif8a:167118sS5zSm_QeE:SMTPCORP
On Sep 22, 2016, at 16:52 , Charles Srstka <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> Actually nope, it showed up in 10.3, making it younger than the target/selector approach.
In that case, I have no plausible rationale why this was done differently. It’s possible there was a performance-related reason. It’s possible it was a design preference on the part of the engineer who introduced the capability. It’s possible it has to do with the ease of overriding the behavior in subclasses. (It’s sometimes awkward to customize the “didEnd”-style behavior.)
_______________________________________________
Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden