• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Mystery Threads
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mystery Threads


  • Subject: Re: Mystery Threads
  • From: Quincey Morris <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:38:38 -0700
  • Feedback-id: 167118m:167118agrif8a:167118sPooMdzZJm:SMTPCORP

On Sep 29, 2016, at 00:15 , Gerriet M. Denkmann <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> 	dispatch_apply( nbrOfThreads, queue, ^void(size_t idx)
>
> As my computer has just 8 CPUs, I thought that using nbrOfThreads > 8 would be silly: adding overhead without gaining anything.
>
> Turns out this is quite wrong. One function (called threadHappyFunction) works more than 10 times faster using nbrOfThreads = a few ten-thousand (as compared to nbrOfThreads = 8).
>
> This is nice, but I would like to know why can this happen.

What makes you think “nbrOfThreads” represents a number of threads?

> Why are the threads seemingly blocking each other?
> What is going on here?
> How can I investigate this?

Isn’t this what Instruments is for?

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (email@hidden)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Mystery Threads
      • From: "Gerriet M. Denkmann" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Mystery Threads (From: "Gerriet M. Denkmann" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Mystery Threads
  • Next by Date: Re: Mystery Threads
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mystery Threads
  • Next by thread: Re: Mystery Threads
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread